AI alignment refers to models acting towards human-intended goals, preferences, or ethical principles. In this paper, we focus on the models' visual perception alignment with humans, further referred to as AI-human visual alignment. Specifically, we propose a new dataset for measuring AI-human visual alignment in terms of image classification. In order to evaluate AI-human visual alignment, a dataset should encompass samples with various scenarios and have gold human perception labels. Our dataset consists of three groups of samples, namely Must-Act (i.e., Must-Classify), Must-Abstain, and Uncertain, and further divided into eight categories. All samples have a gold human perception label; even Uncertain (e.g., severely blurry) sample labels were obtained via crowd-sourcing. The validity of our dataset is verified by sampling theory, statistical theories related to survey design, and experts in the related fields. Using our dataset, we analyze the visual alignment and reliability of five popular visual perception models and eight abstention methods.

Image super-resolution (SR) aims to learn a mapping from low-resolution (LR) to high-resolution (HR) using paired HR-LR training images. Conventional SR methods typically gather the paired training data by synthesizing LR images from HR images using a predetermined degradation model, e.g., Bicubic down-sampling.

HCCV datasets constructed through nonconsensual web scraping lack crucial metadata for comprehensive fairness and robustness evaluations. Current remedies are post hoc, lack persuasive justification for adoption, or fail to provide proper contextualization for appropriate application. Our research focuses on proactive, domain-specific recommendations, covering purpose, privacy and consent, and diversity, for curating HCCV evaluation datasets, addressing privacy and bias concerns. We adopt an ante hoc reflective perspective, drawing from current practices, guidelines, dataset withdrawals, and audits, to inform our considerations and recommendations.

We introduce Stanford-ORB, a new real-world 3DObject inverse Rendering Benchmark. Recent advances in inverse rendering have enabled a wide range of real-world applications in 3D content generation, moving rapidly from research and commercial use cases to consumer devices. While the results continue to improve, there is no real-world benchmark that can quantitatively assess and compare the performance of various inverse rendering methods. Existing real-world datasets typically consist only of the shape and multi-view images of objects, which are not sufficient for evaluating the quality of material recovery and object relighting. Methods capable of recovering material and lighting often resort to synthetic data for quantitative evaluation, which on the other hand does not guarantee generalization to complex real-world environments. We introduce a new dataset of real-world objects captured under a variety of natural scenes with ground-truth 3D scans, multi-view images, and environment lighting. Using this dataset, we establish the first comprehensive real-world evaluation benchmark for object inverse rendering tasks from in-thewild scenes and compare the performance of various existing methods. All data, code, and models can be accessed at https://stanfordorb.github.io/.

Magnification shift is a major obstacle to robust histopathology classification, because models trained on one imaging scale often generalize poorly to another. Here, we evaluated this problem on the BreaKHis dataset using a strict patient-disjoint leave-one-magnification-out protocol, comparing supervised baseline, baseline augmented with DCGAN-generated patches, and a gradient-reversal domain-general model designed to preserve discriminative information while suppressing magnification-specific variation. Across held-out magnifications, the domain-general model achieved the strongest overall discrimination and its clearest gain was observed when 200X was held out. By contrast, GAN augmentation produced inconsistent effects, improving some folds but degrading others, particularly at 400X. The domain-general model also yielded the lowest Brier score at 0.063 vs 0.089 at baseline. Sparse embedding analysis further revealed that domain-general training reduced average signature size more than three-fold (306 versus 1,074 dimensions) while preserving equivalent predictive performance (AUC: 0.967 vs 0.965; F1: 0.930 vs 0.931). It also increased cross-fold signature reproducibility from near-zero Jaccard overlap in the baseline to 0.99 between the 100X and 200X folds. These findings show that calibrated, compact, and transferable representations can be learned without added architectural complexity, with clear implications for the reliable deployment of computational pathology models across heterogeneous acquisition settings.

Humans are remarkably flexible in understanding viewpoint changes due to visual cortex supporting the perception of 3D structure. In contrast, most of the computer vision models that learn visual representation from a pool of 2D images often fail to generalize over novel camera viewpoints. Recently, the vision architectures have shifted towards convolution-free architectures, visual Transformers, which operate on tokens derived from image patches. However, these Transformers do not perform explicit operations to learn viewpoint-agnostic representation for visual understanding. To this end, we propose a 3DToken Representation Layer (3DTRL) that estimates the 3D positional information of the visual tokens and leverages it for learning viewpoint-agnostic representations.

Open-vocabulary semantic segmentation is a challenging task that requires segmenting novel object categories at inference time. Recent works explore vision-language pre-training to handle this task, but suffer from unrealistic assumptions in practical scenarios, i.e., low-quality textual category names. For example, this paradigm assumes that new textual categories will be accurately and completely provided, and exist in lexicons during pre-training. However, exceptions often happen when meet with ambiguity for brief or incomplete names, new words that are not present in the pre-trained lexicons, and difficult-to-describe categories for users. To address these issues, this work proposes a novel attribute decomposition-aggregation framework, AttrSeg, inspired by human cognition in understanding new concepts.